> > Is it just me or is it weird that the package is named py-fabric? > > Why not just "fabric"? > > In addition to the standalone client, you can use fabric as a library > in a python program. That is the reason why I didn't suggest the name > change to the MAINTAINER.
Yeah but it's really known as "fabric". We already made the same mistake with puppet (it used to be ruby-puppet). > If you or others prefer sysutils/fabric, I'm not against the change. The directory does not really matter, you can keep sysutils/py-fabric; it's the pkgname I think that should be changed. But don't just listen to me, let's see if someone else can give some input ;-) -- Antoine
