On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 07:54:56AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > Is it just me or is it weird that the package is named py-fabric? > > > Why not just "fabric"? > > > > In addition to the standalone client, you can use fabric as a library > > in a python program. That is the reason why I didn't suggest the name > > change to the MAINTAINER. > > Yeah but it's really known as "fabric". > We already made the same mistake with puppet (it used to be ruby-puppet). > > > If you or others prefer sysutils/fabric, I'm not against the change. > > The directory does not really matter, you can keep sysutils/py-fabric; it's > the pkgname I think that should be changed. > But don't just listen to me, let's see if someone else can give some input ;-) > > -- > Antoine
ruby-facter and ruby-puppet were mistakes, just as py-fabric is a mistake. So I'd be in favor of changing the pkgname to 'fabric'. -- jasper
