On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 15:26 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > Selon Bernd Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > How about creating stable and snapshot dirs inside the x11/fvwm2 > > directory instead of add a fvwm2-devel port dir? > > Oh, definitely the right thing to do IMHO. > Also, the "-fvicons" subpackage should work for both versions (stable and > snapshot) >
Ok, that's right. We should also adhere Bernd's advice. But should we preserve the same scheme as in 2.4 port? I mean should we build this packages: fvwm2+fvicons-2.x.x fvicons-2.x.x fvwm2-2.x.x Personally, I consider this to be overkill. We can make fvwm2 package and fvwm2-fvicons. Port that uses the latter scheme is attached. > -- > Antoine
fvwm2-full.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
