The decision to avoid the official "Firefox" name has other consequences. Our port currently sends this
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; OpenBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061101 BonEcho/2.0 In contrast, an "official" Linux port sends this: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 You can probably see where this is going... Our users will get "Your browser is not supported, please use Firefox v1.5 or later" on sites that use the user-agent string to figure out what browser the user is on. And therefore the Are we allowed to use FireFox in the UA string as long as we don't use it in the titlebar or Help About, or are the Mozilla folk really that stuck on things?
