On 2021/04/06 03:13, Anindya Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:26:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Ohhhh I see what it's doing. Yeuch. > > > > 'This is a "best effort" parser. If it errors out, we instead end up relying > > on the PyQtWebEngine version, which is the next best thing.' > > > > This suggests that the fallback is not working correctly. We aren't doing > > anything funny with the PyQtWebEngine version. > > For some reason the fallback reports Chromium version as 87.x instead of > 83.x which we have. Debug output (just below the logo): > http://ix.io/2V9a > > I haven't looked into this further to see exactly why PyQt reports the > wrong version. QtWebEngine is reported as 5.15.4 instead of 5.15.2.
Seems that it is picking up the version number of PyQtWebEngine, not QtWebEngine. If the QtWebEngine version number isn't available from PyQtWebEngine then I suppose it could look for the highest-numbered library version instead and use that for the ELF parser..not ideal but at least that should stay working when QtWebEngine is updated.
