On 2021/11/17 20:36, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/11/17 18:45, Omar Polo wrote:
> > > i think you should make sure that it depends on the correct version
> > > then, using wxWidgets->=3.0.5.1p1.
> > 
> > my reasoning was that since the -webkit package is new then the explicit
> > versioning wasn't needed.  I've re-added the version check thought.
> 
> Your reasoning is correct, the LIB_DEPENDS cannot be satisfied unless
> wxWidgets is from after adding the subpackage, so no need for the version 
> check.
> It doesn't hurt to add it, but every unnecessary version check is an extra
> thing to fix if an EPOCH gets bumped (and it's hard to spot) so better not
> use version checks unless they're really needed.
> 
> > retrieving revision 1.36
> > diff -u -p -r1.36 Makefile
> > --- Makefile        10 Sep 2021 13:46:28 -0000      1.36
> > +++ Makefile        17 Nov 2021 17:22:43 -0000
> > @@ -2,10 +2,9 @@
> >  
> >  COMMENT=   cross-platform gettext catalogs (PO-files) editor
> >  
> > -V=         2.4.3
> > +V=         3.0
> >  DISTNAME=  poedit-${V}
> >  CATEGORIES=        devel
> > -REVISION=  0
> >  
> >  HOMEPAGE=  https://www.poedit.net/
> >  
> > @@ -19,10 +18,10 @@ WANTLIB += atk-1.0 boost_regex-mt boost_
> >  WANTLIB += cairo cairo-gobject enchant-2 gdk-3 gdk_pixbuf-2.0
> >  WANTLIB += gio-2.0 glib-2.0 gobject-2.0 gtk-3 gtkspell3-3 harfbuzz icudata
> >  WANTLIB += icui18n icuuc intl lucene++ pango-1.0 pangocairo-1.0 pugixml
> > -WANTLIB += wx_gtk3u_stc-3.0 wx_baseu-3.0 wx_baseu_net-3.0
> > -WANTLIB += wx_baseu_xml-3.0 wx_gtk3u_adv-3.0 wx_gtk3u_core-3.0
> > -WANTLIB += wx_gtk3u_html-3.0 wx_gtk3u_xrc-3.0
> > +WANTLIB += wx_baseu-3.0 wx_baseu_net-3.0 wx_baseu_xml-3.0 wx_gtk3u_adv-3.0
> > +WANTLIB += wx_gtk3u_core-3.0 wx_gtk3u_xrc-3.0 wx_gtk3u_webview-3.0
> >  
> > +# C++14
> >  COMPILER=  base-clang ports-gcc base-gcc
> 
> Please remove base-gcc, it cannot work with C++14 (also at least one
> dependency uses cmake which also cannot build with base-gcc).
> 
> Otherwise this reads good, I will test and get back to you
> 

yep, OK with those little changes.

Reply via email to