On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:20:47PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote: > Solène Rapenne <[email protected]> writes: > > > Le Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:47:54 -0700, > > Tracey Emery <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:25:34PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I was playing with gophernicus and noted that the installed readme says: > >> > > >> > > Development! DO NOT USE unless you want fiery dragons! > >> > > (you probably want to `git checkout 3.0.1`) > >> > > >> > my interpretation is that the paragraph is meant to discourage people > >> > from running gophernicus from the master branch, but we're already > >> > fetching a tagged version. (no 'fiery dragons' for us unfortunately) > >> > > >> > I was a bit puzzled when reading the documentation, what about dropping > >> > the sentence? Or maybe it's clear enough? > >> > > >> > >> This seems an unnecessary patch to carry to me. > > > > indeed, I don't see much value into patching every bad documentation > > provided in packages. At best, you should ask upstream to change the > > way they do to avoid such situations. > > ack. there's also not much value into switching to the uploaded > distfile now.
None? Part of the suggestion from sthen was to go from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1, wasn't it? Pledge and unveil support seem worth the effort, although I don't use the app. Just a thought. :) > > sorry for the noise :) > -- Tracey Emery
