Tracey Emery <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:20:47PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote: >> Solène Rapenne <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Le Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:47:54 -0700, >> > Tracey Emery <[email protected]> a écrit : >> > >> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:25:34PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > I was playing with gophernicus and noted that the installed readme says: >> >> > >> >> > > Development! DO NOT USE unless you want fiery dragons! >> >> > > (you probably want to `git checkout 3.0.1`) >> >> > >> >> > my interpretation is that the paragraph is meant to discourage people >> >> > from running gophernicus from the master branch, but we're already >> >> > fetching a tagged version. (no 'fiery dragons' for us unfortunately) >> >> > >> >> > I was a bit puzzled when reading the documentation, what about dropping >> >> > the sentence? Or maybe it's clear enough? >> >> > >> >> >> >> This seems an unnecessary patch to carry to me. >> > >> > indeed, I don't see much value into patching every bad documentation >> > provided in packages. At best, you should ask upstream to change the >> > way they do to avoid such situations. >> >> ack. there's also not much value into switching to the uploaded >> distfile now. > > None? Part of the suggestion from sthen was to go from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1, > wasn't it? Pledge and unveil support seem worth the effort, although I > don't use the app. Just a thought. :)
I completely missed the version change, sorry. I'll take a look at updating it. thanks for pointing it out, I thought sthen linked the distfile for the current port version. >> >> sorry for the noise :) >>
