On 2022/03/29 19:57, portno12 wrote: > new ports for small python libraries needed by another port i am working on. > generated with portgen and all tests pass for both. license wasnt detected > right but seems to be BSD-3Clause for both ports
- | # $OpenBSD$ we are no longer using this in ports -current | MODPY_VERSION = ${MODPY_DEFAULT_VERSION_3} don't use this, use FLAVOR=python3 and FLAVORS=python3 | RUN_DEPENDS = pypi/py-jsonpointer${MODPY_FLAVOR}>=1.9 pypi is an invalid category. drop the version check, it's not needed. use MODPY_PYTEST if it does something sensible. (sometimes you need to point at a particular directory or file with MODPY_PYTEST_ARGS, especially if you get some error to do with an import mismatch). setting expectations: we're currently working on things that need to make release, so new ports are not a priority at the moment. > > both repos didnt have much info so i used the comment as the DESCR. should > something be done different in these cases? it's friendly to the user to include a bit more information if possible. for example maybe a quick description of what a json pointer / json patch is? i found this on a website for some other related software which could serve as inspiration for py-jsonpointer.. | JSON Pointer is a standardized (RFC6901) way to select a value inside a | JSON Document (DOM). This can be analogous to XPath for XML document. | However, JSON Pointer is much simpler, and a single JSON Pointer only | pointed to a single value.