------ Original Message ------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Python Tkinter 8.6
On 2022/06/08 10:55, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> >
> > Not me, the port did - I swear!
> > $ cd /usr/ports/lang/python/2.7; make fake; make update-plist
> > Should yield the same result for porters who are not me.
> > Those .so's aren't part of TkInter.
>
> Yet the change to tkinter caused them to build. So if there _was_ a
> no_tkinter PSEUDO_FLAVOR then packaging -main would fail if the
> CONFIGURE_ARGS was not used. But then the question is why they're
> now built.
>
> So the change for tkinter is causing something deeply strange with
> platform detection, we really need to figure out what's going on
with
> that
>
>
> That is the result obtained with -current Python 2.7 without my
changes.
>
>
> $ cd /usr/ports/lang/python/2.7; make fake; make update-plist
>
> Not
>
> $ cd /usr/ports/mystuff/lang/python/2.7; make fake; make
update-plist
>
>
> Stu
Oh! Are you not on a 64-bit arch then?
Just checked: ok on amd64, PLIST problem on i386.
Stu
