On Wed, 11 Feb 2026, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 11:45:40AM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > Here are the bumps I found with show-reverse-deps and the magic of
> > recursion. Seems like a lot? No idea about the double-commas.
>
> As I wrote in my last mail, I think only the ports having a direct
> (explicit) BUILD_DEPENDS on devel/swig + the ports depending on
> py-scipy need a bump.
>
> My reasoning is: SWIG generates code, so if a port BDEPs on it, its code
> may change due to the update. py-scipy RDEPs on it, so I expect that
> things depending on py-scipy may change, so I'd bump them as well.
>
> This might not cover static links (which are rare), but I don't think it
> makes sense to bump all reverse deps.
>
Excellent, thanks.
This is one part of porting where I'm not overly confident.
Stu
biology/py-biopython
cad/freecad
cad/kicad
cad/opensta
comms/hamlib
comms/sigrok/libsigrok
devel/clang-tools-extra
devel/libftdi1
devel/llvm
devel/subversion
games/fifengine
geo/gdal
geo/mapserver
graphics/hugin
graphics/mypaint
graphics/py-pivy
mail/grommunio/gromox
mail/kopano/core
math/graphviz
net/bro
productivity/gnucash
security/py-M2Crypto
security/py-pyscard
sysutils/u-boot
textproc/libmarisa
textproc/link-grammar
textproc/redland-bindings
math/py-scipy
astro/py-astropy
comms/gnuradio
graphics/py-seaborn
math/py-clarabel
math/py-cvxpy
math/py-ecos
math/py-osqp
math/py-scikit-image
math/py-scikit-learn
math/py-scs
multimedia/pitivi
