On Wed, 01 Jul 2026 21:05:01 +0200, Daniel Dickman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > (3) devel/swival -- Coding agent for doing security audits > > > > > > Potentially ok but need time to think > > > Very much appreciate your help, let me know if you spot any more issues > for swival. I'm hoping we can import it soonish. >
After some thought we're facing a trade off: py-flask-appbuilder to swival, right? I see that py-flask-appbuilder needs py-flask-limiter version 3 already. I don't use py-flask-appbuilder, but it is your port, and I think as a kind of workaround is add legacy py-flask-limiter for py-flask-appbuilder with conflict. Or yes, just mark it broken. From user's point of view I think to have swival is better than py-flask-appbuilder -- wbr, Kirill
