On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:57:57PM +0100, viq wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:34:38PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:05:20PM +0100, viq wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:56:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:10:45AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> > > > > hmm, on Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Paul Irofti said that
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:02:39PM +0200, Sergey Prysiazhnyi wrote:
> > > > > > > Any Subj in ports tree? Like centericq, etc? Thank you a lot for
> > > > > > > advise,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can always go with finch. Its the cli version from Pidgin.
> > > > >
> > > > > interesting.
> > > > > is it possible to make a finch flavour?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > hm, and it's not available for 4.1 as package (upgrade in planning)
> > > >
> > > > afaik it is. Debian do have finch as a separated package, so why not...
> > > > I've been thinking about this to. Maybe I'll look into it when I get
> > > > more free time on my hands.
> > >
> > > grep bin/finch /usr/ports/net/pidgin/pkg/PLIST
> > > bin/finch
> >
> > I don't understand what you're trying to say here. Of course finch is
> > in the PLIST, otherwise how would it get added to the binary package
> > that you install?
>
> I could have misunderstood. I understood the previous statements as "I
> can't find finch, how can I get it". Or was "can we have a package just
> for finch, without the large dependency list of pidgin" meant?
>
The word was `flavor', which is actually not applicable here. A
subpackage perhaps. Anyway, the question wasn't about where finch is
located, thus the misunderstanding.
