Chris Billington writes: > - upstream uses git submodules for pugixml, SingleApplication, and the > 'elements' library. I have used the same pinned revisions in > SITES.xxx/DISTFILES.xxx as the upstream branch.
DIST_TUPLE would be a better fit for this. > - The 'elements' user-submitted library (CC-BY-SA 3.0) is pinned against > a 9-month-old commit of the submodule repo. > Is it permissible to use a recent commit instead, since that would still > make a reproducible build but would include more recent items? If doing so provides value and doesn't introduce incompatibility, then sure. > - portcheck notes 3 Makefile lines longer than 80 chars, but it's not > easy to break them without sacrificing readability. Is that acceptable? Yes.
