On Thu Oct 15, 2026 at 08:37:46AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 07:52:41AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Wed Oct 14, 2026 at 08:02:27AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > > > > It could benefit from an upgrade path. > > > -- > > > Antoine > > > > > > > Thanks Antoine, > > > > A new diff that replaces -qt6 and -qt5 with a new -qt subpackage and > > provides upgrade paths for both. > > Ok for me. > Out of curiosity, why the move from -qt6 to -qt ? >
>From the port side, ""-qt"" is the default, and upstream does not add a suffix such as "-qt6/5" to the binary. In my opinion, "qt" should always be the latest version, and we should only specify the version when it is absolutely necessary.
