On October 15, 2026 8:43:51 PM GMT+02:00, Rafael Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu Oct 15, 2026 at 08:37:46AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 07:52:41AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >> > On Wed Oct 14, 2026 at 08:02:27AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >> > > >> > > It could benefit from an upgrade path. >> > > -- >> > > Antoine >> > > >> > >> > Thanks Antoine, >> > >> > A new diff that replaces -qt6 and -qt5 with a new -qt subpackage and >> > provides upgrade paths for both. >> >> Ok for me. >> Out of curiosity, why the move from -qt6 to -qt ? >> > >From the port side, ""-qt"" is the default, and upstream does not add a >suffix such as "-qt6/5" to the binary. In my opinion, "qt" should always >be the latest version, and we should only specify the version when it is >absolutely necessary.
Ok thanks -- Antoine
