On 2026/10/25 14:12, Marc Espie wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 11:10:19PM -0400, George Koehler wrote: > > > > 1: we have a package bochs-3.1p1-debug.tgz; its debug package would > > have the confusing name bochs-debug-3.1p1-debug.tgz. > > Nope, bochs-debug-debug-3.1p1.tgz > > I don't see the problem.
it is indeed bochs-debug-3.1p1-debug.tgz (debug flavour), I agree it's not a conflict though. On 2026/10/25 15:24, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > Why not "-dbg" or "-dbgsym"? > > "-dbgsym" is specific enough not to clash with a flavor like > bochs--debug or another base package name like php-dbg. It also > conveys the intent of shipping debug symbols. I would prefer either of these.
