On Sat 2008.06.14 at 01:19 +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > There are a dozen or so optional dependencies. > > We could keep sox slim and self-contained and skip the external > components. We could use the kitchensink approach and include all > the external formats. > > New sox also supports putting various parts including the external > formats into modules. We could multipackage the modules with the > dependencies, but having a dozen sox-FOO packages isn't that great > either. > > Ideas?
by very nature, isn't sox meant to be the 'universal' translator? in my mind that means that one would expect everything that we can support...
