Christian Weisgerber [Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 01:19:33AM +0200] wrote: >We could keep sox slim and self-contained and skip the external >components. We could use the kitchensink approach and include all >the external formats. > >New sox also supports putting various parts including the external >formats into modules. We could multipackage the modules with the >dependencies, but having a dozen sox-FOO packages isn't that great >either. > >Ideas? > >From pkg/DESCR:
"SoX is intended as the Swiss Army knife of sound processing tools." Sounds like the kitchensink approach to me. But I also like subpackages because we don't need FLAVORS then. Maybe something like in sysutils/symon, lots of small sox-FOO packages but also one big package with all modules. Bernd
