On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Ian Darwin wrote:
>> Gypsy was designed to fix "the numerous design flaws found in GPSD". >> These are compiled at http://gypsy.freedesktop.org/why-not-gpsd.html. > > So how does this compare to gpsd for real applications? I am asking > since the main gpsd developer is also an OpenBSD developer, and maybe > there are ways to fix the problems in gpsd? > > Oh, and I find this rude. DBUS is more crap I don't need or want on my machines, the regular gpsd serves my needs very well. I'm sure I could write a "why-not-dbus-gypsy.html" page, but I can't be arsed. I'm surprised that I'm even taking the time to reply to this. If it works, let them co-exist. GPSD does have some kind of DBUS support... but I have no use for it so I can't say how well it works. CK -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
