> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Ian Darwin wrote: > > >> Gypsy was designed to fix "the numerous design flaws found in GPSD". > >> These are compiled at http://gypsy.freedesktop.org/why-not-gpsd.html. > > > > So how does this compare to gpsd for real applications? I am asking > > since the main gpsd developer is also an OpenBSD developer, and maybe > > there are ways to fix the problems in gpsd? > > > > Oh, and I find this rude. > > DBUS is more crap I don't need or want on my machines, the regular > gpsd serves my needs very well. I'm sure I could write a > "why-not-dbus-gypsy.html" page, but I can't be arsed. I'm surprised > that I'm even taking the time to reply to this. > > If it works, let them co-exist. GPSD does have some kind of DBUS > support... but I have no use for it so I can't say how well it works.
What are you saying? I want to understand this very clearly. Are you two saying no to a new package? Or what is this fight about? Or do the little words twist your panties?
