Am 12.01.2009 um 07:33 schrieb Federico G. Schwindt:
I prefer to have the full output rather than only the ANSI'd version of it (which is quite ugly IMHO).
Would removing the colours work for you?If not, I recommend removing the printfs completely. But the plain output will be ugly anyway, as for every target, there is a for i in foo; do. So it will always look ugly ;). That's why there's the coloured output and the full output only for debugging purposes. Even when developing audacious etc., most of the time we keep the .SILENT as usually, I'm the only one who has to remove .SILENT for debugging purposes as I'm the only one developing that build system ;).
-include is GNU make thing, and I don't want to add it to the dependencieswhen it can be removed with one line diff.
Well, not GNU only. NetBSD has it as well. But as OpenBSD and FreeBSD don't have it, it was changed to include (without the minus) and the .deps files are generated on ./configure if they're missing.
Whenever mowgli and mcs switch to use it, we'll pick it up, but for now commenting one line is better, unless there is a very good reason not to.
Well, I don't know how others use ports, but I often do just "make" inside the port, change some files and "make" again. This might break it, well, better say it will if I change any headers. I'd need to cd to the work dir then, type make clean there and then type make in the port dir again. Dependency generation is there for a reason ;).
-- Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
