I likes but as a flavor for sure.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:37:36AM -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> woops. i missed this somehow. i'm going to try this now, but i'm not
> sure whether it should be a flavor or if it should be added to the
> port as a non-option. comments from the list?
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Andreas Bihlmaier
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello Chris,
> >
> > did you ever have a look at this?
> > If you are not interested just say so, no problem.
> >
> > Regards
> > ahb
> >
> >>Hello Chris,
> >>
> >>attached is a patch against the current version of your vim port, which
> >>adds support for integrated gdb (http://clewn.sourceforge.net/).
> >>
> >>It is really much nicer to work with vim + gdb than with a seperate vim
> >>and gdb session. Just see the :help gdb for a short introduction and
> >>debug a (small) piece of code, I expect/hope you get the same impression
> >>that it is really a nice way of debugging.
> >>
> >>I would be very glad to get some feedback although there are still some
> >>edges and corners to it (especially the @exec in PLIST-gdb), since
> >>inclusion of this into the ports tree would be safe quite a bit of
> >>recompiling after installing each new snapshot.
> >>
> >>Regards
> >>ahb
> >
>
>
>
> --
> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
>
