On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:12:49AM -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Marco Peereboom <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I likes but as a flavor for sure.
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:37:36AM -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> >> woops. i missed this somehow. i'm going to try this now, but i'm not
> >> sure whether it should be a flavor or if it should be added to the
> >> port as a non-option. comments from the list?
>
> A few observations:
>
> 1) shouldn't this generate vim-gdb-${V}.tgz ... no FLAVOR suffix?
> ...
> ===> Building package for vim-gdb-7.2.77-gtk2-gdb
> Create /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/vim-gdb-7.2.77-gtk2-gdb.tgz
> Link to /usr/ports/packages/amd64/ftp/vim-gdb-7.2.77-gtk2-gdb.tgz
> Link to /usr/ports/packages/amd64/cdrom/vim-gdb-7.2.77-gtk2-gdb.tgz
I guess, at least it would not hurt the eye as bad.
> 2) the -gdb subpackage needs a to require a vim
> RUN_DEPENDS-gdb= ::${BUILD_PKGPATH}
Of course.
> 3) i was getting checksum failures trying to pkg_delete. offending
> file was /usr/local/share/vim/vim72/doc/tags
This is indeed a problem, but I have to update this file, otherwise
:he vimgdb
does not work and until you have used it to debug a couple programs, you
really want to use it.
Should I send you a patch for 1) and 2) or will you patch this, since
you have a deeper understanding of this port anyway?
I'm not sure what to do about 3).
Regards
ahb
