On Friday 24 April 2009 19:56:09 Stuart Henderson wrote: > here's 1.6.0.9.
Seems fine here, no problems thus far. Are you (as your diff implies) intending to replace 1.4 with 1.6?
On Friday 24 April 2009 19:56:09 Stuart Henderson wrote: > here's 1.6.0.9.
Seems fine here, no problems thus far. Are you (as your diff implies) intending to replace 1.4 with 1.6?