On Monday 27 April 2009 16:45:45 Stuart Henderson wrote: > I'm definitely keen to get some 1.6 version in-tree, but I don't > fully trust it to replace 1.4 yet.
Agreed on both points. > I was thinking of either moving them into subdirectories, or keeping > them alongside each other (like we did with firefox/openoffice) and > switching later. > But then, I'm not sure what to do with 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 > and ..... This (1.6.0.9) seems pretty useful now.
