hmm, on Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:08:40PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > I don't have to bring up any good reasons for some random person on > the mailing lists feels "entitled".
this approach is broken. "some random person on the mailing list" slash ocasional contributor slash bug reporter slash tester if i may please. you are full of shit. this is not about me. you are twisting my words. > You are a whiny snively jerk, and every time you open your mouth I go > work on something else. as "some random person on the mailing list" you sure insulted me more times than i can remember. in my country that kind of trash talk implies you stand up to your words. man enough to say it into my eyes? hm? how about a one on one mountain man? hm? you are a pigdog-man who hides behind insults from the safe distance of a terminal. ni! <insert chicken-sound here> but you will not drive me away, and i will try and help make this system better even if you kicked and screamed, you hysty. because i dont mind your attitude at all, i judge a system by its quality not by its leader. and i think you are basically a good man at the core, a man with qualities like integrity, consistence, but maybe not charisma. but just like everybody else, sometimes you are an idiot. if the price of good, secure code is that you once in a while shout at people for little apparent reason, i am glad i helped to pay the price! god bless canada. oi! i might get hostile now a bit! -f ps. this email really works only if you read it aloud in mock monthy python english -- after two weeks of dieting, all i lost was two weeks.
