Jacob Meuser <[email protected]> wrote:

> > (It also retains the problem from previous versions that playing
> > MP3s sucks all the CPU it can get.)
> 
> it's cpu usage can be halved (in my testing, anyway) by using
> 'mp3blaster -t=0'.  would it make sense to make that the default?

It used to be in a busy loop, now the behavior is much more reasonable.
But you are right, -t=0 reduces the CPU usage even further.  I don't
know if it helps or hinders on people's old 486, though.  Elsewhere
it probably doesn't matter either way.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          [email protected]

Reply via email to