On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 07:59:19PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Jacob Meuser <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > (It also retains the problem from previous versions that playing
> > > MP3s sucks all the CPU it can get.)
> > 
> > it's cpu usage can be halved (in my testing, anyway) by using
> > 'mp3blaster -t=0'.  would it make sense to make that the default?
> 
> It used to be in a busy loop, now the behavior is much more reasonable.
> But you are right, -t=0 reduces the CPU usage even further.  I don't
> know if it helps or hinders on people's old 486, though.  Elsewhere
> it probably doesn't matter either way.

it worked fine on my 195MHz sgi.  slowest machine I have access to.

-- 
[email protected]
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org

Reply via email to