Hello,

Now that the port tree has been completely unlocked,
I am resubmitting the protobuf port.
The last tarball contained the fixes for the errors that Landry Breuil had.

Hope this can go in.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Auclair Vincent
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:56:27AM +0100, Auclair Vincent wrote:
>>> Update version from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0
>>>
>>> Tarball is attached.
>>
>> Comments portswise :
>>
>> - SHARED_LIBS usually start at 0.0
>> - as CONFIGURE_STYLE is set to gnu, automake won't be run, so
>>  *Makefile.am won't be read, so patching them is useless.
>> patches/patch-src_Makefile_am and patches/patch-Makefile_am can go away.
>> regress fails with:
>> gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/local/libgtest.la', needed by
>> `protobuf-test'.  Stop.
>> -> your patch-src_Makefile_in is are wrong. (missing /lib/ after
>> ${LOCALBASE} for libgtest*.la.)
>>
>> Other than that, looks good. Builds fine @amd64/ppc.
>
> Updated tarball which corrects the problems
>
>
> --
> Vincent Auclair        -      auclair.vincent[ at ]gmail.com
> (+33) 6 80 77 59 67
>



-- 
Vincent Auclair        -      auclair.vincent[ at ]gmail.com
(+33) 6 80 77 59 67

Attachment: protobuf.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Reply via email to