On 2010/04/16 09:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/04/16 01:44, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > * Will this upgrade from tint (version 1)? The package name has changed to
> > 'tint2' (although the path in ports has not). Should work right?
>
> No (but you could have found that for yourself easily enough...)
> Either do PKGNAME=${DISTNAME:S/tint2/tint} or you will need to use quirks.
> exercise for the reader: spot the missing / :)
