On 2010/04/18 17:48, Sebastian Liem wrote: > > Landry wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 02:47:42PM +0200, Sebastian Liem wrote: > > > I used MAKE_FLAGS instead of patching the Makefile is that ok? > > > > Yes if it works, but you still need SHARED_LIBS in port Makefile so that > > the shared lib is correctly registered in PLIST and in package db. > Done. New version is attached. > > > > Stuart wrote: > > > > This is going to cause problems with the samba update. > > > Howcome? I didn't see samba installing any shared libs and > > > I could build net/samba without problems. What's "the samba update". > > > > It's the update to 3.4.x (or 3.5.x) floating around in ports@ ml > > archive, which should soon replace the outdated version we have in-tree. > > Ah, I see. Can't samba build depend on talloc and not build it itself?
I think considering where libtalloc comes from, it seems to make more sense to have it built by the samba port, possibly placed into a subpackage so something needing talloc can pull in just that package rather than the whole of samba. There are a couple of relatively small things that need doing to get the 3.5.1 port ready (if anyone knows how to get CONFIGURE_STYLE=autoconf working with it, that would be handy..) also Ian has been looking at 3.5.2 and trying to get around more of the "all the world's linux" problems that keep cropping up.
