On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 06:09:42PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/06/29 14:49, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Since the plan is to make 2.6 the default, some people have mentioned > > > the > > > python update posted on ports@ some time ago, so below is the update as > > > well > > > as moving the default. > > > I've not removed 2.5 for the time being as some have shown some concerns > > > and we can always kill it later. > > > So if you're interested in or using python please test the diff below, > > > specially on something else than i386 and amd64, although more testing on > > > those won't hurt. > > > I just tested it on i386 so far. > > > > So, any testers? > > > > f.- > > > > The things I use regularly work fine. Admittedly this is not all that > many programs, but in the absence of better reports from the people who > actually requested the update... > > No additional regression test failures on amd64 (one is fixed). > > I am ok with the update and switching MODPY_VERSION. > > Regarding timing, I can help out with the bumps (at least take some > categories), but not right away.
i'm on holidays next week, so i'm thinking about commiting this after i get back if there are no issues reported. will you be available to help me with the bumps by then? f.-
