On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 10:42:05PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Pekka Niiranen wrote: > > > Damien Miller wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > > > The things I use regularly work fine. Admittedly this is not all that > > > > many programs, but in the absence of better reports from the people who > > > > actually requested the update... > > > > > > > > No additional regression test failures on amd64 (one is fixed). > > > > > > > > I am ok with the update and switching MODPY_VERSION. > > > > > > ok djm@ too, I have been running with 2.6 as the default for > 1 year. > > > > > The last 2.x version of Python, v2.7, is about to be released on July. > > Do not switch to v2.6, please.. > > Care to give a reason why not? Typically 2.x.0 releases have suffered > from a number of bugs and compatibility problems. I don't think it is > a great idea that we jump onto them straight away, and we certainly > haven't done so in the past.
for those whining about 2.7.. have you tested 2.6 at all? would you be testing 2.7? thanks but no thanks. f.-
