On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/11/03 00:19, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Steven Mestdagh wrote: > > > > > Marc Espie [2010-10-31, 12:26:43]: > > > > I finally made up my mind about it. Those are the rules. Don't commit > > > > new > > > > ports without proper spacing. Whenever you update ports, if you have > > > > the > > > > time, please add the spacing. > > > > > > I don't have a problem with this, but I notice people send in diffs which > > > mix updates with spacing, and a simple update diff quickly becomes really > > > long and harder to read. So I suggest we don't intermix this too much. > > > > I cannot agree more. Stop the madness please. > > Absolutely. I would suggest also that we don't do this port by port. > If we have to do this I think the usual method of changing a category > at a time is the only sane way, we really don't want hundreds of > "space conversion" diffs for individual ports cluttering po...@.
I think it should be up to the people maintaining the port. This space thing is just unreadable to me. As right as it may be, it looks just wrong to my eyes and makes thel bleed... > Also suggestions welcome for how to make the PERMIT_* variables > not look totally awful. Oh yeah... -- Antoine
