Hi I updated the diff to remove the unnecessary bits removed as requested. Please let me know if additional updates are needed. Otherwise, please commit if diff is acceptable.
Thanks, Ryan On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Feb 10, 2011, at 1:07 AM, "Federico G. Schwindt" <fg...@lodoss.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 07:39:20PM -0800, Ryan Boggs wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Attached is the diff that applies the necessary change sets (15465, >>> 15471, & 15468) from django to fix the issues mentioned in the >>> security announcement released yesterday. Details can be found here: >>> "http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/feb/08/security/";. I tested >>> this diff on i386 using the Feb 8 snapshot. >>> >>> I understand that ports is currently locked but since this is a >>> security update, I thought it was important to get this in as soon as >>> possible. I chose to patch 1.2.4 instead of upgrading to 1.2.5 >>> because I am under the impression that this is the preferred method of >>> submitting security updates when ports is locked. Please let me know >>> if I am mistaken. >>> >>> I plan on upgrading to 1.2.5 once the ports tree is unlocked. >>> >>> Please let me know if there are any questions/comments/suggestions. >> >> there are some changes there that are not really needed (15349). >> can you restrict the changes to the security bits please? > > Sorry, those snuck in by mistake. I will fix and resubmit today. >> >> f.- >> > Thanks, > Ryan >
django_124p0.diff
Description: Binary data
