On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:42:57PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:06:56AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > > > My current best theory is that the brand new link prefetch stuff > > > > > (ugh!) > > > > > is easting gobs of file descriptors while another site is loading. So > > > > > when webkit tries to establish a connection to get like favicon or css > > > > > it runs out and renders the pages sans css or favicon (missing > > > > > pictures > > > > > etc etc). The link prefetch can't be disabled since it doesn't have a > > > > > knob. I am trying to reason with the webkit people (again) that > > > > > anything prefetch is not really that great for everybody. > > > > > > > > Well, if there a way we could introduce such a knob in the port then? > > BTW: I'm against a knob, too. If we patch it locally (in the port), > > I'm for disabling all the prefetching stuff unconditionally, because > > it's just plain stupid. If upstream accepts a knob (because they > > obviously think that prefetching is clever), that's another story. > I agree, just get rid of it. > If upstream is so big on having this prefetching crap, I doubt they will want > even a knob. > Just patch it locally unless a knob is really easy.
Prefetching stuff is a brilliant idea on a sane internet connection. But people probably want to use their browser in a bush on GPRS 56k modem and share the line with others, too. Also, at least in our country, there are lots of stupid greedy ISPs who bill you based on how much traffic do you transfer. Why should either group of people be limited in favor of the other? -- Martin Pelikan
