On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Anyways, anyone have comments on the porting itself? (tarball in first > > message.) > > > > Yes but only minor; please start SHARED_LIBS from 0.0 rather than > using upstream's versioning, and there's a minor whitespace nit > in MASTER_SITES, otherwise looks good to me. > > With those changes I would be ok with this going in after we're > done with lock for 5.1.
Thanks.
The latest tarfile is attached with the minor changes discussed on this
thread.
Can someone please add this to the ports tree?
Off list it was also suggested that consider removing the version from
the library name, but I didn't patch that. If anyone wants to, that is
fine.
Thank you,
Jeremy C. Reed
echo 'EhZ[h ^jjf0%%h[[Zc[Z_W$d[j%Xeeai%ZW[ced#]dk#f[d]k_d%' | \
tr '#-~' '\-.-{'
ports-devel-log4cplus.tar
Description: Binary data
