On 2012/06/11 10:22, Manuel Giraud wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a port of the new version of emacs. Currently testing on > i386.
A couple of things I noticed reading the port, - missing desktop/icon-cache dependencies and @exec/unexec lines - mandoc isn't expected to handle gzipped manpages; /etc/man.conf does have settings to handle compressed manpages which work OK, but in general we don't use gzipped manpages in OpenBSD. - minor but we don't generally start a new version with anything in REVISION-xx - is there anything to indicate that the amd64/mips64 "gzip tsang-b5.el" parts are no longer needed? > FWIW, I'm all for killing the emacs 23 port in the process. Is there a reason to have more than "a current version" and 21.x anyway? i.e. would it make sense to just have editors/emacs21 and editors/emacs?
