On 2012/08/12 00:36, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> Does this need a revision bump?
> There's no change to the resultant package.
Technically not, but bumps are cheap, so I would do it anyway.
> --- patches/patch-boust 27 Dec 2003 23:36:46 -0000 1.2
> +++ patches/patch-boust 12 Aug 2012 04:17:45 -0000
> @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ $OpenBSD: patch-boust,v 1.2 2003/12/27 2
> # If it is, run tclsh, otherwise, run wish.
> # (The backslash makes the following line a comment as well... \
> -THESH="wish"
> -+THESH="wish8.4"
> ++THESH="wish${MODTK_VERSION}"
> # blah\
> -for arg in "$@" ; do if [ "$arg" == "--o" ] ; then THESH="tclsh" ; fi ;
> done ; \
> -+for arg in "$@" ; do if [ "$arg" == "--o" ] ; then THESH="tclsh8.4" ; fi ;
> done ; \
> ++for arg in "$@" ; do if [ "$arg" == "--o" ] ; then
> THESH="tclsh${MODTCL_VERSION}" ; fi ; done ; \
> # \
> exec $THESH "$0" "$@"
>
no real difference now, but personally I'd use MODTCL_BIN /
MODTK_BIN rather than tclsh${MODTCL_VERSION} and wish${MODTK_VERSION}.
