On 08/12/12 09:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/08/12 00:36, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> Does this need a revision bump?
>> There's no change to the resultant package.
>
> Technically not, but bumps are cheap, so I would do it anyway.
Alright
>
>> --- patches/patch-boust 27 Dec 2003 23:36:46 -0000 1.2
>> +++ patches/patch-boust 12 Aug 2012 04:17:45 -0000
>> @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ $OpenBSD: patch-boust,v 1.2 2003/12/27 2
>> # If it is, run tclsh, otherwise, run wish.
>> # (The backslash makes the following line a comment as well... \
>> -THESH="wish"
>> -+THESH="wish8.4"
>> ++THESH="wish${MODTK_VERSION}"
>> # blah\
>> -for arg in "$@" ; do if [ "$arg" == "--o" ] ; then THESH="tclsh" ; fi ;
>> done ; \
>> -+for arg in "$@" ; do if [ "$arg" == "--o" ] ; then THESH="tclsh8.4" ; fi ;
>> done ; \
>> ++for arg in "$@" ; do if [ "$arg" == "--o" ] ; then
>> THESH="tclsh${MODTCL_VERSION}" ; fi ; done ; \
>> # \
>> exec $THESH "$0" "$@"
>>
>
> no real difference now, but personally I'd use MODTCL_BIN /
> MODTK_BIN rather than tclsh${MODTCL_VERSION} and wish${MODTK_VERSION}.
>
>
MODTCL_BIN / MODTK_BIN contain the full path to the shells which we might not
want here.
Either way - Ok?
Thanks,
Stu
