On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:47:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/05/13 17:42, Ted Unangst wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 21:51, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > - I'm a bit dubious about this license. > > > From the manpage: > > > > > > | SEE ALSO > > > | Mail::SpamAssassin::Message::Metadata::Received, from which the > > > rules > > > | and some of the IP address matching constants were blatantly > > > stolen. > > > > > ... Wasn't spamassassin apache-licensed by the time this was written? > > > or is it just using code from an earlier version of SA? > > > > Specific to this port: > > Are "rules and IP address matching constants" subject to copyright? > > What's the text in the individual files actually say? Does either > > license affect the permit options? > > > > In general: > > Are we really going to take it upon ourselves to be the copyright > > police? > > Oh, good point, that's Debian isn't it: and they have libemail-received-perl > ;-) > > > I'd just as soon take whatever upstream's author says is the > > license and stay out of whatever disputes there may be (and certainly > > let's not go causing trouble). > > I'm OK with the updated version (though Marcus, watch out there's a CVS > directory in the tar, please zap it before you import)
Sure, will do that. Thank you for checking so quickly!
