On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 02:50:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> The soname command line parameter should just be removed on the line
> below what is being modified.

That would likely make it work. But I don't think we could push
such a patch upstream. My current patch isn't good enough for
upstream, either, of course. So I'd appreciate suggestions that
result in something more upstream-friendly than my current patch,
something worth spending more of my time on.

If we can only come up with more upstream-unfriendly solutions, we
might as well just use my current patch, which I've already spent
time testing. I don't want to waste more time testing again for no
good reason.

Reply via email to