On 05/09/13 9:57 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 02:24:03PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/09/05 14:43, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 02:50:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
The soname command line parameter should just be removed on the line
below what is being modified.
That would likely make it work. But I don't think we could push
such a patch upstream.
Hmm, why not? Obviously it would need to be conditional on OS
I couldn't tell from Brad's comment whether he meant it to be
OS-dependent or just the simple one-line removal hack.
I'm working with the upstream devs now.
Well what goes into the ports tree and how the issue is ultimately fixed
upstream doesn't have to be the same but the goal is to eventually have
it fixed properly upstream. The upstream fix would be OS dependent.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
