On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:22:23PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 06/12/13 8:05 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:00:42PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> >>Here is an update to libvpx 1.2.0.
> >>
> >>OK?
> >
> >All i know is that libvpx 1.2.0 got just merged in mozilla-central, and
> >they're already working on the upcoming 1.3.0 for vp9 support.
> >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918550
> >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763495
> >
> >I'll try to enable --with-system-libvpx within firefox, since now iirc
> >it's more supported (and less patched) than before.
> 
> I want to look at 1.3.0 but I have no idea how long it will take
> them to put out a release. 1.2.0 was tagged 11 months ago and even
> with me poking and prodding them on IRC and their mailing list it
> still took them 9 months to put out the release. Very odd behavior
> with these guys. So I'm looking at 1.2.0 since it is just a small
> number of bug fixes and we'll see how long 1.3.0 takes to be released.
> 
> AFAIK 1.2.0 has fixes for some issues found via FF.

And apparently 1.3.0 was tagged 4 days ago, since mozilla now requires
it for vp9 support in what will be firefox 28 in 12 weeks.
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/1ba23d5502e1

Landry

Reply via email to