On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:22:23PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > On 06/12/13 8:05 AM, Landry Breuil wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:00:42PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > >>Here is an update to libvpx 1.2.0. > >> > >>OK? > > > >All i know is that libvpx 1.2.0 got just merged in mozilla-central, and > >they're already working on the upcoming 1.3.0 for vp9 support. > >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918550 > >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763495 > > > >I'll try to enable --with-system-libvpx within firefox, since now iirc > >it's more supported (and less patched) than before. > > I want to look at 1.3.0 but I have no idea how long it will take > them to put out a release. 1.2.0 was tagged 11 months ago and even > with me poking and prodding them on IRC and their mailing list it > still took them 9 months to put out the release. Very odd behavior > with these guys. So I'm looking at 1.2.0 since it is just a small > number of bug fixes and we'll see how long 1.3.0 takes to be released. > > AFAIK 1.2.0 has fixes for some issues found via FF.
And apparently 1.3.0 was tagged 4 days ago, since mozilla now requires it for vp9 support in what will be firefox 28 in 12 weeks. https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/1ba23d5502e1 Landry