On 06/12/13 7:01 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:22:23PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On 06/12/13 8:05 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:00:42PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
Here is an update to libvpx 1.2.0.
OK?
All i know is that libvpx 1.2.0 got just merged in mozilla-central, and
they're already working on the upcoming 1.3.0 for vp9 support.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918550
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763495
I'll try to enable --with-system-libvpx within firefox, since now iirc
it's more supported (and less patched) than before.
I want to look at 1.3.0 but I have no idea how long it will take
them to put out a release. 1.2.0 was tagged 11 months ago and even
with me poking and prodding them on IRC and their mailing list it
still took them 9 months to put out the release. Very odd behavior
with these guys. So I'm looking at 1.2.0 since it is just a small
number of bug fixes and we'll see how long 1.3.0 takes to be released.
AFAIK 1.2.0 has fixes for some issues found via FF.
And apparently 1.3.0 was tagged 4 days ago, since mozilla now requires
That's why I said what I did in the first sentence. Tagging in itself
doesn't result in a release.
it for vp9 support in what will be firefox 28 in 12 weeks.
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/1ba23d5502e1
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
