On Tue, Jun 3, 2014, at 02:09 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > On 06/03/14 01:06, Kent Fritz wrote: > > Here's a very simple scan that shows a fundamental problem: [...] > > That answer is wrong, both ports are open and responded to the syn > > packets. The above was run on a May 28th AMD snapshot, but I get the > > same results on i386 from an older April 3rd snapshot. PF was > > disabled. > > > I have this result on current 28 May amd64: [...]
I tried this twice. I have no idea how this happened. This is on a relatively recent -current, btw. $ sudo nmap -Pn -sS -p22,80 scanme.nmap.org Starting Nmap 6.46 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-06-03 02:26 CDT Nmap scan report for scanme.nmap.org (74.207.244.221) Host is up (0.059s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp filtered ssh 80/tcp open http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.68 seconds $ sudo nmap -Pn -sS -p22,80 scanme.nmap.org Starting Nmap 6.46 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-06-03 02:26 CDT Nmap scan report for scanme.nmap.org (74.207.244.221) Host is up (0.060s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp open ssh 80/tcp filtered http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.59 seconds $ -- Shawn K. Quinn [email protected]
