On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 09:28 CEST, "Shawn K. Quinn" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014, at 02:09 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > On 06/03/14 01:06, Kent Fritz wrote: > > > Here's a very simple scan that shows a fundamental problem: > [...] > > > That answer is wrong, both ports are open and responded to the syn > > > packets. The above was run on a May 28th AMD snapshot, but I get the > > > same results on i386 from an older April 3rd snapshot. PF was > > > disabled. > > > > > I have this result on current 28 May amd64: > [...] > > I tried this twice. I have no idea how this happened. This is on a > relatively recent -current, btw.
I see the same on i386, snapshot only few days old. > > $ sudo nmap -Pn -sS -p22,80 scanme.nmap.org > Starting Nmap 6.46 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-06-03 02:26 CDT > Nmap scan report for scanme.nmap.org (74.207.244.221) > Host is up (0.059s latency). > PORT STATE SERVICE > 22/tcp filtered ssh > 80/tcp open http > > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.68 seconds > $ sudo nmap -Pn -sS -p22,80 scanme.nmap.org > > Starting Nmap 6.46 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-06-03 02:26 CDT > Nmap scan report for scanme.nmap.org (74.207.244.221) > Host is up (0.060s latency). > PORT STATE SERVICE > 22/tcp open ssh > 80/tcp filtered http > > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.59 seconds > $ > > > -- > Shawn K. Quinn > [email protected] >
