Hello Nigel, On 12 November 2014 13:54, Nigel Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > Try the attached .... >
Sorry, I'm not certain what I would do with a diff. Do I make a patch with what's in ports now? > a) I checked META.json / Makefile.pl for dependency changes / version > requirement changes. Version is 1.10 not 1.1 for p5-File-Next, we have > 1.12 so 1.10 check will pass. > > b) Tests some had been skipped because of missing dependencies, added > the extra dependencies required for these tests. All tests do pass apart > from one skipped test. The one test being skipped is unfinished > upstream, even latest in github. Besides make test, make > port-lib-depends-check, portcheck should be run, neither reported any > issues, only tested on amd64. > > Also checked for other packages using p5-ack, none, so no additional > checks required or carried out. > > There are a lot of upstream commits after 2.14, not sure how stable the > 2.14 version is. ChangeLog contains a concern about problem introduced > in 2.14, Commit history another, but ignored as related to a test. If > some of these later changes are required the port needs patches adding > until next version is released. > > That's interesting, hopefully it will be okay on openbsd. Thanks for everyone writing in regarding this. > > thanks, jb -- ------- inum: 883510009027723 sip: [email protected] xmpp: [email protected]
