Hi Dimitry ... On 10 July 2015 at 14:15, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Vadim Zhukov said: > > 7. I can't test the actual port since I'm not registered at the > > website, and I don't want to do this. What does distfile license says > > exactly? > Same here. David, please, post the license verbatim in your next mail. > > I pushed a new version and it s commented in the Makefile above the no ftp/cdrom ... variables. > FWIW homepage of this software says: > > | The free of charge offering has a restricted use license, for own > | usage only; no redistribution or derivative works are permitted. > | Contact us to upgrade or to enable usage as part of a service > | offering. > > This port has patches, so compiled packages will be derivative works. > > Derivative, int this case, means forking and so forth, whereas I just complete the cmake process to fit openbsd port structure :-) > David, you are representing DeviceAtlas, right? If you (DeviceAtlas) > don't want us to distribute source tarball and packages, why don't you > provide port tarball and/or binary packages on your site? > Yes I "represent", I m just the developer though :-) I just made openbsd port I did for pkgsrc-wip here http://pkgsrc.se/wip/deviceatlas-enterprise-c The website provide a zip file (not my choice it s due to the website constraints). The binaries that might happen but later. > > -- > Dmitrij D. Czarkoff > >
